Sunday, November 19, 2006

A Generosity of Words

Is there anything more satisfying than being right? ...OK, but besides that?

I've written before about how Evangelical Christians are the most caring and generous people in this country... And now an economist agrees.

SYRACUSE, N.Y. -- Syracuse University professor Arthur C. Brooks is about to become the darling of the religious right in America -- and it's making him nervous.

The child of academics, raised in a liberal household and educated in the liberal arts, Brooks has written a book that concludes religious conservatives donate far more money than secular liberals to all sorts of charitable activities, irrespective of income. In the book, he cites extensive data analysis to demonstrate that values advocated by conservatives -- from church attendance and two-parent families to the Protestant work ethic and a distaste for government-funded social services -- make conservatives more generous than liberals.

The book, titled "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism" (Basic Books, $26), is due for release Nov. 24.


The book's basic findings are that conservatives who practice religion, live in traditional nuclear families and reject the notion that the government should engage in income redistribution are the most generous Americans, by any measure.

Conversely, secular liberals who believe fervently in government entitlement programs give far less to charity. They want everyone's tax dollars to support charitable causes and are reluctant to write checks to those causes, even when governments don't provide them with enough money... he says it forcefully, pointing out that liberals give less than conservatives in every way imaginable, including volunteer hours and donated blood.

His main finding is quite startling, that the people who talk the most about caring actually fork over the least.
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/204/story_20419_1.html

"People who talk the most..." Liberals talk a good game. They effortlessly claim the moral high ground for themselves... with words, catch-phrases, and sound bites that fall noble on the ear and stir our innermost desires for justice and equality. Their kind and politically correct words have been duping the masses for decades.

We Evangelical Christians are as hypocritical, spoiled, and hedonistic as the next rich American, but we should never fall prey to the fable that we are somehow callous and less caring than the secular liberals. It seems that liberal charity is limited to a generosity of words.

11 comments:

SkyePuppy said...

Excellent post!

Do I feel smug? Oh yes.

Malott said...

Thanks.

Hope to see you later - although I'm pretty sure it will only be me.

Anonymous said...

"Brooks says he started the book as an academic treatise, then tightened the documentation and punched up the prose when his colleagues and editor convinced him it would sell better and generate more discussion if he did.

To make his point forcefully, Brooks admits he cut out a lot of qualifying information."


You forgot those two paragraphs.

Let's be honest -- there are greedy bastards on both sides. And those that give freely on both side.

Politics aside, don't studies show that the middle and lower class tend to give more than the upper class? Regardless of politics?

Malott said...

mclefty,

Obviously greed isn't peculiar to one polotical party.

However, I tend to focus on: "conservatives who practice religion, live in traditional nuclear families and reject the notion that the government should engage in income redistribution are the most generous Americans, by any measure."

I figure the book will probably show that as you progress to the right, from Episcopal, Methodist, to Evangelical, Pentocostal - you will have a steady trend of increased giving as larger numbers of more conservative church-goers approach the Old Testament "tithe", or 10 percent of their income - which is the traditional starting place... you give "at least" 10 percent.

Call conservative Christians what you want, but they are hardly selfish or uncaring.

Malott said...

And,

Politics aside, the "religious" poor are more generous than the "secular" poor.

Anonymous said...

What about liberal Christians?

I think that too often some people on the right think they have sole rights to Christianity or the Christian faith. And that clearly isn't the case.

Malott said...

Well now there is a can of worms to open.

Christian and Liberal on what issue?

...surely not gay marriage - since homosexuality is condemned in the Bible.

...surely not on abortion - killing for convenience doesn't sound God-inspired.

I suppose you can be a socialist in the name of Jesus. Although curing mankind's ills with your own money would be a nobler endeavor.

I know there are a great many Roosevelt era Christians who support liberal politicians, but I always figured that they were only supporting "their team..." figuring they would support George Bush if he was a Dem, for instance.

Usually Liberal Christian suggests a person who is "nice" but doesn't let the "Jesus Thing" rule his life. It's not my place to judge, but I would strongly suggest to these individuals that they need a closer relationship to their creator and his teachings.

Maybe you could expand on your statement.

Anonymous said...

interesting article Malott. i've linked to it at my blog. thanks for the heads up.

paw said...

On liberals and Christianity, something to consider -

Some see politically active evangelicals as focusing on behavior to the exclusion of appealing to hearts. Some think that God's domain is the heart, that there's a spiritual purpose to freedom, including the freedom to make bad choices. Some see politically active evangelicals expending all their capital and energy crusading against certain temptations, certain behaviors, selectively quoting certain fragments of scripture to support their prejudice against the objects of their crusades, and in the process alienating forever many, many hearts, and for what - ? Some are of the opinion that those who brought together religion and politics have debased religion for purely earthly reasons, causing in many an almost reflexive distaste for the language and message of the Christian religion - creating a spiritual partisanship, if you will. What can be said of people who would bring about such a situation?

I come around here to see if I can better understand what's going on over there on your team, not to debate religion or to heckle (much), and I certainly am not interested in introducing my own faith or lack thereof, such as it may be, in such a dogmatic forum. I'll hang up and take my answers off line.

ps - I volunteered 4 hours last weekend.

Malott said...

PAW,

Volunteering sounds like the Lord's work to me.

I think it is very convenient to criticize Evangelical activism as somehow being outside the realm of our purpose - while at the same time - a group of Episcopal Priests standing up with gays to further their agenda might not garner your disapproval.

And our hearts? What could be more loving than using every means at our disposal to reach this dying world.

What could be more loving than influencing a lonely mixed-up kid - to [not] experiment, and develop an appetite for, a lifestyle that will cut his life expectancy in half?

Politics is such a small part of our focus. And I don't think we debase anything when we use God-given instruction to influence our world.

I believe Everyone is religious. Everyone serves a master. We were created that way. The religion of the Left is being preached every day in the political realm... The Left shouldn't expect to have a monopoly on such things.

Anonymous said...

Here is my take on the difference and the similarity between liberal and conservative Christians. We all believe in taking care of the poor. But the liberals believe it should be done by the government forcefully taking our money and redistributing it to the charity selected by some special interest (with an administrative cost of about 75%). And the conservatives believe it should be given of our own free will to the charity of our choosing. Same gift of good intentions, by a different means!