Tuesday, December 27, 2016

If I was King

Volume I

If I was King I would decree that all news persons and pundits would no longer be allowed to describe Supreme Court nominees as Liberal or Conservative.

The so-called Liberal nominee would be referred to as anti-Constitutionalist, Liberal-Activist, or Lawless-Tyrannical.  (Or Lawless-Tyrannical-Rex just for fun)

The so-called Conservative nominee would be referred to as a Constitutionalist, Strict Constructionist, or Originalist.

Note:  A Lawless-Tyrannical could also be a conservative who sought to accomplish, through judicial decree, a policy or law that could not be established legislatively by Congress or State Legislature.  A strict-constructionist by definition would be opposed to such a device.

It was an activist court (The Burger Court) that overturned the laws of 50 state legislatures when it legalized abortion and ignored the will of The People.

The Constitutionalist Justice by definition seeks to limit the power of the Federal Government (including the power of The Supreme Court) and allow the states, communities, and the people to govern themselves.

The terms Liberal and Conservative have political relationships and meanings which can only confuse the issue.


Thursday, December 22, 2016

2017 New Years Resolutions for White Guys | MTV News

Not Made for White Guys

This video was created to cast a bad light - not upon white guys, but rather conservative white guys.  Conservative white guys are the target here... And also angry white guys who are assumed to be conservative.

It's interesting that Kanye West was also demoted to the stature of white guys because he visited with Donald Trump after the election.  Well, he should know better.

The tendency is to ignore this kind of stupidity, but you have to realize that the ignorant, developing minds of many young people are absorbing this stuff as some kind of deep and meaningful truth that the rest of us are just too blind to see.

You see this kind of thing and it almost makes you miss the days of "Up With People."  (Well maybe not)

The entertainment industry in this country has been pushing this kind of honorless, iconoclastic, immoral bilge upon a willing audience since its first success with Saturday Night Live 40 years ago.  When I was young and ignorant I loved it. 

It now saturates all of entertainment and it's not going to change.  All responsible adults can do is laugh at it and call it what it is.


Wednesday, December 21, 2016

The Popular Vote

First of all, I suspect that many non-citizen votes were cast on election day, and we know there were Democrat precincts that counted more votes than there were registered voters to cast them.  So I'm convinced that if Hillary really won the popular vote, it was not by the margin reported.  (We need the Electoral College because Leftists cheat.)

That said, I welcome the Democrats' fixation upon the popular vote and their prostrations, gyrations, and conniptions in an attempt to cast doubt on the election.

The latter makes them look like petty poor losers, and the former gives them the certitude that they need change nothing to be successful with their left-wing, unpopular ideology and style.

I know that they are confident that they need not change because Nancy Pelosi is still their leader in The House.  Their Former standard bearer Bill Clinton is insulting angry white guys, who I believe are still a rather large voting block.  Their enablers in the news media are still showing their bias and confirming the fact that they can't be trusted to report the truth.

As annoying as it all is, I believe that if Trump accomplishes anything good in the next two years, the midterm elections in 2018 should be very satisfying entertainment for Conservatives.


Friday, December 09, 2016

An Activist Court and the Electoral College

I have to wonder what would have happened with the 2016 election if Justice Antonin Scalia had died a year earlier and Obama had placed another leftist-activist judge on the Supreme Court.  I have to wonder if there would have been a challenge to the fairness of an election in which someone won who had fewer votes than the loser.

I have to wonder if the Democrats would have found a vehicle in which to place the issue before the Activist Supreme Court to decide the fairness of the results and rule on whether or not the Electoral College was outdated and had trampled the rights of the majority of voters.

I have to wonder if Trump would still be the President-Elect.

I know what the Constitution says, but an activist court cares nothing for the Constitution... It cares only about results.