Gay Freedom Trumps Yours
From Chuck Colson and his Breakpoint Broadcast:
Two women decided to hold their civil union ceremony at a New Jersey pavilion owned by the Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association. This Methodist group told the women they could not “marry” in any building used for religious purposes. The Rev. Scott Hoffman said a theological principle—that marriage can only exist between one man and one woman—was at stake.
The women filed a discrimination complaint with the New Jersey Division of Civil Rights. The Methodists said the First Amendment protected their right to practice their faith without being punished by the government. But punish the Methodists is exactly what New Jersey did. It revoked their tax exemption—a move that cost them $20,000.
Then there’s the case of the Christian physicians who refused to provide in vitro fertilization treatment to a woman in a lesbian relationship. The doctors referred her to their partners, who were willing to provide the treatment. But that wasn’t good enough. The woman sued. The California Supreme Court agreed with the woman, saying that the doctors’ religious beliefs didn’t give them the right to refuse the controversial treatment.
In Massachusetts, Catholic Charities was told they had to accept homosexual couples in their adoption service, or get out of the adoption business. They chose correctly—they got out of the business.
In Mississippi, a mental health counselor was sued for refusing to provide therapy to a woman looking to improve her lesbian relationship. The counselor’s employers fired her—a move that was backed up by the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
In New York, the Albert Einstein College of Medicine at Yeshiva University refused to allow same-sex couples to live in married student housing, in keeping with the school’s orthodox Jewish teachings. But in 2001, the New York State Supreme Court forced them to do so anyway—even though New York has no same-sex “marriage” law.
In Albuquerque, a same-sex couple asked a Christian wedding photographer to film their commitment ceremony—and sued the photographer when she declined. An online adoption service was forced to stop doing business in California when a same-sex couple sued the service for refusing, on religious grounds, to assist them.
Not a single one of these judicial decisions would stand if they were put on a ballot and the people were allowed to decide. But - We The People - no longer run this country.
This will not change any time soon because the Democrats accept tyranny as a means to an end... The mainstream media covers them... And the lazy, ignorant sheep that line up to vote for them care nothing about liberty as long as they get their bread and circuses.
....
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
This shows a very good reason for businesses of ANY type to post signs saying "We hold the right to refuse service to anyone, and will exercise that right."
Btw, if I were the church and some of these other folks - I'd try to find an attorney that would be willing to take an appeal to the Supreme Court. I'd also ask for restitution from the lower courts for infringing on my religious rights.
In these specific cases I think these were dum judges who don't even know how to uphold ALL of our rights granted under the U.S. Constitution.
Unless President Obama and our U.S. Congress is willing to stand up and protect peace loving Christian and Jewish organizations from such stuff, they will see churches doing less and less for the needy because they'll be afraid of a lawsuit.
Oh yeah...did I forget to mention that tomorrow, THURSDAY, is Bekah's birthday? I think it should be "Let's pick on Bekah day!" :-D
Post a Comment