So What Exactly Happens When You Put Liberal, Activist Judges On The Supreme Court?
NEW YORK — Angry politicians vowed to keep writing laws that condemn child rapists to death, despite a Supreme Court decision saying such punishment is unconstitutional.
Republican Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal called the ruling "incredibly absurd," "a clear abuse of judicial authority" and said officials will "evaluate ways to amend our statute to maintain death as a penalty for this horrific crime."
Obama said he was outraged, too! But as president, he will nominate liberal activist judges... Just like the ones who made this decision.
My idea is this: When a child is raped, put the rapist in a room with all the child's male relatives and all the fathers and grandfathers from the child's neighborhood... Oh... For about an hour. Then, the Supreme Court can decide what happens to whatever is left.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I like your idea. It's neither cruel nor unusual. It's a punishment that fits the crime.
Sometimes good sense is lost on lawyers and judges.
Not a bad idea!
It's less cruel than mine, which is:
take a board, nail the guy's "parts" to the board, put lighter fluid on it, hand him a sharp knife, and drop a match. He can decide if he wants to die with it or live without it.
Anyone who can't be trusted to behave needs to have their things taken away.
Your suggestion is good. However, child rapists get their punishment when the drug dealer they share a cell with finds out that they harmed a kid.
Post a Comment