Thursday, July 06, 2006

Remembering Terri

SkyePuppy rules, as always. I was there reading a story about the man who recovered consciousness after being in a vegetative state (no, not Arkansas) for twenty years.
http://skyepuppy.blogspot.com/2006/07/man-recovers-from-permanent-vegetative.html

In a new medical study sure to remind the world of the debate surrounding the forced dehydration death of Terri Schiavo, researchers found the injured brain of a man in a "vegetative state" for 19 years rewired itself, permitting him to renew communication with his loved ones.

I saw this story on TV some time last week, and the most striking part of the experience was the assured enthusiasm with which the reporter explained to her audience that this was a completely different situation than the Terri Schiavo case. Completely different. Completely. Different. Different in a very complete sort of way. A most complete difference, and completely, amen.

The man's doctor probably told the reporter this, or possibly the reporter looked until she found a doctor who would tell her this.

I would wager my left leg that this man's doctor told his family that he would never recover, and that the only difference between the man and Schiavo was that he didn't have an estranged spouse that wanted him dead.

When I started working with doctors, what impressed me most was how smart they were, and how utterly clueless they were about the human body and its healing. It's 2006, and the medical community has much more to learn about healing than it has learned thus far. They work hard and try sincerely, but they are still operating in the Bronze Age of medicine. This man's story is an illustration of modern medicine's ignorance.

The right to die is an interesting concept. But Terri's inconvenient life was not slipping away. She was not dying. She was dehydrated and starved to death. And all the assuring in the world will not convince me that what doctor's learned from this man's recovery will not lead to better methods of treatment... methods that might have one day brought Terri a clearer relationship with her world.

5 comments:

SkyePuppy said...

The thing that impressed me most during the Terri ordeal was how tenaciously people cling to life. Terri did, and her parents clung to her.

It's easy to ask somebody whose body is whole if they would like to live in a minimally conscious state. Duh! Of course not. Nobody's going to sign up for that--not when the alternative is being healthy.

But when the question is, "What would you prefer, death or an impaired life that includes contact with loving family?" I think there are a lot of people who would choose to live.

But the pressure from the vocal sector of society is toward pulling the plug and saving the medical equipment for the "deserving" ones.

We owe brain-injured people the protection of their right to live and breathe and love as best as they can. If the least of these aren't safe, then nobody is.

SkyePuppy said...

And another thing...

When I started working with doctors, what impressed me most was how smart they were, and how utterly clueless they were about the human body and its healing.

When I got my degree in Psychology, my favorite class was the one on the Brain and Behavior. It's amazing how much the brain works to repair itself. Neurons hate to be bored.

When someone loses his eyesight, for example, the sensory receptors stop sending input to the optical part of the brain. So the vision neurons look for something to do and usually find the hearing receptors and touch receptors nearby. So they get busy over there, and voilĂ , we have a blind man with super hearing and touch.

So it's no surprise that the brain is able to repair itself. It's just a shame that it took so long.

But with the recent advances with adult stem cells in repairing some spinal cord injuries, perhaps brain injury repair could be coming soon (the brain and the spinal cord have different types of neurons).

SkyePuppy said...

Oops. I think I misspoke. The brain and the spinal cord have different types of myelin sheaths.

Christina said...

Very well said, Chris (and Skyepuppy). You two are like the dynamic duo of blogging!

You know, what struck me about your post is the part about the reporter vigorously claiming that this case was different, completely different, from the Schiavo case. Me thinks thou dost protest too much...

Bryan Alexander said...

Terri Schiavo's case is what first inspired me to start my blog and was the topic of my first post. If you haven't read it, you can read it here.

Chris and Sky - Thanks for the posts.