Thursday, February 07, 2008


To Embrace McCain

I think we are all catching our breath, trying to understand how this trainwreck happened. How did we end up with the one Republican candidate least likely to unite the party? Most of us simply don't know what we're going to do in November.
How did it happen?

I think it started with Fred Thompson's reluctance... And then his inability to shed the "lazy" monicer.

Of course, Mike Huckabee happened. Obviously, Chuck Norris had more influence on the Huckabee sophisticates than Michelle Malkin, Laura Ingraham, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, and the entire staff at The National Review... combined!

Who knew?

But you have to hand it to Huckabee... This squirrelly little guy from Arkansas, who never had a chance at the nomination... Who cleverly grabbed the Evangelicals and torpedoed perhaps the one Republican that could have united the party... Successfully defeating Romney because he didn't try to run the most liberal state in the nation as the reincarnation of Lester Maddox.

And Mitt... A little too stiff... A little too slow to attack the liberal record of McCain.

And just- who are - these McCain supporters? The irascible curmudgeon, liberal-rearend -kissing constituency?

Conservatives are left with no good options.

We rally to McCain and we become the Republican version of the Democrat Black voter... who toes the line and never realizes promises from our party. And McCain will lose, anyway.

But left will be a Party that knows it can count on us no matter who they nominate.

I think McCain will get the Huckabee voters... Their candidate has been slobbering all over McCain since the race began. But the Romney conservatives? They're the thinkers, the true conservatives... And we will be harder to convince.

6 comments:

SkyePuppy said...

Crap!

Malott said...

Pupster...

My analysis was crap? Or you agree that our choices are crap?

SkyePuppy said...

My dear Chris,

Your analysis was fine. It's crap! that Romney dropped out and now we're stuck with McCain.

Tsofah said...

Ok, my friends...just needing some insight here: why not Huckabee? I think many of Romney's folks very well may go to Huckabee, so...why not? I have no idea which one I dislike the most?

SkyePuppy said...

Delta,

Huckabee has an even more impossible time of winning the nomination than Romney did. Romney could have pulled it off if he got about 95% of the remaining delegates. Huckabee would need McCain to give him some of his (McCain's) delegates. Not going to happen. McCain is the nominee. All that's left is the formalities.

And Huckabee is a tax and spend kind of guy, based on his record in Arkansas. Not my dream candidate.

Tsofah said...

What if Romney gave his candidates to Huckabee?

I mean, looking at records, I'd say Huckabee could be a better candidate that McCain...tax and spend happens only if it passes...and so far, no one is as it seems, ya know?