tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14242496.post114461755597963352..comments2023-10-20T08:07:46.557-04:00Comments on Malott's Blog: Malotthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09908995141115792851noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14242496.post-1144704479752174062006-04-10T17:27:00.000-04:002006-04-10T17:27:00.000-04:00Chris...I plan on seeing the piece when as soon as...Chris...I plan on seeing the piece when as soon as I can. I don't think Stone had it correct and I am still ambivalent towards a greater conspiracy that the Govm't killed JFK. The boxes would have helped but the action of the Rifle and the ability of even a superb marksman to make that many shots in that time frame with that weapon accurately has been discounted time and again. I simply don't think Oswald acted alone. At the same time...The Warren Report was the typical milkbrad overworded blowhard stuff that we always get out of a Washington Investigation. And it places much doubt on the politicians ability to actually get to the truth of the matter. I believe that the commision, when faced with variables and evidence they could not explain took the lazy way out adn posited it's own theorys as to what happened just to close the deal.LarryChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01613113182141495476noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14242496.post-1144661459520229112006-04-10T05:30:00.000-04:002006-04-10T05:30:00.000-04:00Larry,I hope you get a chance to see the documenta...Larry,<BR/>I hope you get a chance to see the documentary. The computer 3D images based upon measurements at the scene and the Zabruder film would probably answer many of your questions. <BR/>I can't comment on the ballistics, other than what I saw in the piece, but I do know that Oswald had placed boxes at the window on which he could steady his shot.<BR/><BR/>As always, thanks for your comments.Malotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09908995141115792851noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14242496.post-1144636912369885372006-04-09T22:41:00.000-04:002006-04-09T22:41:00.000-04:00I agree with this on many levels...But as a Shoote...I agree with this on many levels...But as a Shooter and a Pistol Marksman while in the Service, I was always troubled my the ballistics evidence highlighted in the Warren Commisions report. Bullets, especially high velocity ones such as those used to shoot Kennedy do not behave in tha matter. Had he been shot with a .227 I would have more faith in the plausibility of that account. I have studied ballistics somewhat and it just does not add up...Additionaly, I recall being in te library building in the late 70's...Even then as a kid I questioned the possibility of Oswald making those shots. His marksmans scorecard was at a stationary target at 200 yards lying in the prone, Kneeling, or standing postions. Additionally, the rifle claimed to have been used was sorely inadequate for the accuracy and speed required to make the other shots...And the Evidence that the Bullet exited out the back of Kennedy's skull has never been subjected to the kind of Scruntiy it should have...Hollywaood makes movies and the truth is never as important as the story...Evidence the new breed of Journalists that we suffer with...LarryChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01613113182141495476noreply@blogger.com